{"id":699,"date":"2023-06-29T10:39:25","date_gmt":"2023-06-29T10:39:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/?p=699"},"modified":"2024-03-25T22:17:18","modified_gmt":"2024-03-25T22:17:18","slug":"the-fideistic-leap","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/the-fideistic-leap\/","title":{"rendered":"The Fideistic Leap"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1>Appendix 5 \u2013 The Fideistic Leap<\/h1>\n<p>One of the most interesting challenges to reasonable and rational Christianity was to reject the possibility that Christianity could or more strongly, <em>should<\/em> be defended rationally. \u00a0Such a rejection might immediately seem implausible for those of us schooled in even the mildest of the rationalist traditions. \u00a0However, the rejection is sometimes not a rejection of rationalism <em>per se<\/em> but the claim that the logic is internal to the form of life and cannot be expressed outside it. \u00a0Thus, we might conceive of this particular view as Wittgensteinian fideism.<a href=\"#_ftn1\" name=\"_ftnref1\">[1]<\/a> \u00a0Yet, even more radically, there are some that held that something about faith is opposed to the limitations of rationality, the mildest form being in the perhaps captured in many charismatic evangelical churches that <em>\u201creason takes us this far, faith takes us further (or to the \u2018next level\u2019)\u201d<\/em><em>.<\/em><a href=\"#_ftn2\" name=\"_ftnref2\">[2]<\/a>\u00a0 However, there is also the extreme form of that view that reason is implacably opposed to faith as found in the work of Kierkegaard who reacted to what he saw as the idolatry of Hegel with regards to the totalising system of rational dialecticism. \u00a0Kierkegaard (and I would also note Heidegger <a href=\"#_ftn3\" name=\"_ftnref3\">[3]<\/a> ) are perhaps the most sophisticated expressions of this subjective position.<\/p>\n<p>We should make a leap of faith with regards to our practical reason and are rather seeking after an authenticity of the purity of heart, the precious gift of a good conscience borne out of a living faith:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cShe recounts that she had heard someone say that, on being brought to the hospital, Kierkegaard had said he had come there to die. Yet on seeing him she saw radiating from his face, \u2018mixed with the pain and sorrow\u2019, a \u2018blissful feeling of triumph\u2019: \u2018Never before have I seen the spirit break through the earthly sheath in such a way and convey to it a lustre as though it were itself the body transfigured in the luminous dawn of the resurrection\u2019\u201d.<a href=\"#_ftn4\" name=\"_ftnref4\">[4]<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Under such a conception, it is only in reaching beyond the limitations of our ability to express in language that we truly know:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe most embracing general message of <em>Fear and Trembling<\/em> seems to be, then, that the notion of faith is in current discussion of it so far cheapened that what is talked about is not properly called faith at all; and that if we are to praise venerable figures like Abraham, or Abraham in particular since he is revered as the father of faith, we should be made to appreciate what it was <em>like to be Abraham<\/em> undergoing the trial of faith. If Abraham is to be said to be great, then we should be given a clear picture of what it was that he achieved\u2026\u201d<a href=\"#_ftn5\" name=\"_ftnref5\">[5]<\/a> (emphasis added)<\/p>\n<p>Kierkegaard communicates something of great importance to us here about the limits of reason or the proper conception of reason, but it is his Christian foundation that <em>tempers<\/em> the leap into unrestrained irrationality.\u00a0 Sartre used his starting point but in losing his \u201cfaith\u201d lost himself:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cMy retrospective illusions are in pieces.\u00a0 Martyrdom, salvation, immortality:\u00a0 all are crumbling; the building is falling in ruins.\u00a0 I have caught the Holy Ghost in the cellars and flung him out of them.\u00a0 Atheism is a cruel, long-term business\u2026I have renounced my vocation, but I have not unfrocked myself\u201d.<a href=\"#_ftn6\" name=\"_ftnref6\">[6]<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>So, we seemed to have proved the point we started with, at some point, our worldview can only be understood in the terms of the system itself and in how we have lived as cultures.\u00a0 Baier refers to the \u201cwisdom of previous ages\u201d and Blackburn appeals similarly:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cPerhaps we never found logos or a \u2018first philosophy\u2019, an underlying foundational story telling us, from somewhere outside our own <em>world view<\/em>, just why that <em>world view<\/em> is the right one. But perhaps we have learned to do without that, just as we learn to retain our hard-won confidences, without closing our minds to any further illuminations that the future may bring. Above all, I hope we have become confident in using our well-tried and tested vocabulary of explanation and assessment. We can take the postmodernist inverted commas off things that ought to matter to us: truth, reason, objectivity and confidence. They are no less, if no more, than the virtues that we should all cherish as we try to understand the bewildering world about us.\u201d<a href=\"#_ftn7\" name=\"_ftnref7\">[7]<\/a>\u00a0 (emphasis added)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Blackburn recognises that a worldview will define our ethical life and indeed our theoretical life also.\u00a0 Unlike Sartre he refuses to surrender to the absurdity of his existence but chooses to believe that what we consider ethically valuable really <em>does<\/em> have value despite the inability to give an exhaustive justification that would satisfy the global sceptic.\u00a0 We are not too far from Kierkegaard again for though we cannot completely excoriate the sceptic, they are unimportant and\/or irrelevant to practical reasoning and we <em>choose<\/em> the ethical life; it is the essence of legitimate and responsible human life.<\/p>\n<h2>References<\/h2>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref1\" name=\"_ftn1\">[1]<\/a> D Z Phillips and Kai Nielsen had an exchange over many years on this issue, see Nielsen, K., &amp; Phillips, D. (2005), <em>Wittgensteinian Fideism?<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref2\" name=\"_ftn2\">[2]<\/a> However, such schools cannot but help to come to relativistic conclusions as they can offer no criteria to judge between competing truth claims; indeed, it becomes illogical to assert there could be an objective truth.\u00a0 As we have noted, the postmodern malaise currently afflicting the academy and popular culture asserts that the rigorous intellectual defence of <em>any<\/em> position might be considered imperialistic or authoritarian.\u00a0 The sceptic may then assert with the nascent free-thinker Bodin (1593) that <em>\u201ceach is refuted by all\u201d<\/em> for their worldviews are incommensurate.\u00a0 Plantinga elegantly refutes Bodin and the many other pluralists or secularists that assert a similar position by exposing the fallacy lurking there that incommensurability necessarily implies some kind of incoherence.\u00a0 Plantinga argues that one can have sufficient warrant to maintain an exclusivist epistemic position though you are very much aware of the \u201cfacts of pluralism\u201d, particularly when the initial \u201cdefeaters of pluralism\u201d end up reinforcing your exclusivist convictions as we noted in the main body of the thesis.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref3\" name=\"_ftn3\">[3]<\/a> Although known for the utter density and opaqueness of his work, Heidegger was also able to write with astonishing vividness, his \u201cThe Bridge\u201d (Heidegger, 1985 (1971), pp.150ff) is a masterpiece of mindfulness and encounter with the world.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref4\" name=\"_ftn4\">[4]<\/a> Kierkegaard, S. (1996). Postscript &#8211; The End or the Beginning. In S. Kierkegaard, &amp; A. Hannay (Ed.), <em>Papers and Journals.<\/em> London: Penguin Random House., p.649.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref5\" name=\"_ftn5\">[5]<\/a> Hannay, A. (2003 (1985)). Introduction. In S. Kierkegaard, <em>Fear and Trembling<\/em> (A. Hannay, Trans., Kindle ed., pp. 48-552). London: Penguin.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref6\" name=\"_ftn6\">[6]<\/a> Sartre, J. P. (2000 (1967)). <em>Words.<\/em> London: Penguin., p157.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref7\" name=\"_ftn7\">[7]<\/a> Blackburn, S. (2006). <em>Truth &#8211; A Guide for the Perplexed<\/em> (Kindle ed.). London: Penguin., p.220.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Appendix 5 \u2013 The Fideistic Leap One of the most interesting challenges to reasonable and rational Christianity was to reject the possibility that Christianity could or more strongly, should be defended rationally. \u00a0Such a rejection might immediately seem implausible for those of us schooled in even the mildest of the rationalist traditions. \u00a0However, the rejection [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":700,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[280,1,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-699","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-phd-appendices","category-random-thoughts","category-thesis"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.2 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\r\n<title>The Fideistic Leap - Planet M Blog<\/title>\r\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The Fideistic Leap - One of the most interesting challenges to reasonable and rational Christianity was to reject the possibility that Christianity could or more strongly, should be defended rationally.\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\r\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/the-fideistic-leap\/\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Fideistic Leap - Planet M Blog\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Fideistic Leap - One of the most interesting challenges to reasonable and rational Christianity was to reject the possibility that Christianity could or more strongly, should be defended rationally.\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/the-fideistic-leap\/\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Planet M Blog\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-06-29T10:39:25+00:00\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-03-25T22:17:18+00:00\" \/>\r\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kierkegaard.jpeg\" \/>\r\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"519\" \/>\r\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"456\" \/>\r\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Michael Macneil\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\r\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Michael Macneil\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\r\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/the-fideistic-leap\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/the-fideistic-leap\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Michael Macneil\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/78d80b09bb7f5dca3e2779fb6a2c2d33\"},\"headline\":\"The Fideistic Leap\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-06-29T10:39:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-03-25T22:17:18+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/the-fideistic-leap\/\"},\"wordCount\":1107,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/78d80b09bb7f5dca3e2779fb6a2c2d33\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/the-fideistic-leap\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kierkegaard.jpeg\",\"articleSection\":[\"PhD Appendices\",\"Random Thoughts\",\"Theses\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/the-fideistic-leap\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/the-fideistic-leap\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/the-fideistic-leap\/\",\"name\":\"The Fideistic Leap - Planet M Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/the-fideistic-leap\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/the-fideistic-leap\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kierkegaard.jpeg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-06-29T10:39:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-03-25T22:17:18+00:00\",\"description\":\"The Fideistic Leap - One of the most interesting challenges to reasonable and rational Christianity was to reject the possibility that Christianity could or more strongly, should be defended rationally.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/the-fideistic-leap\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/the-fideistic-leap\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/the-fideistic-leap\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kierkegaard.jpeg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kierkegaard.jpeg\",\"width\":519,\"height\":456,\"caption\":\"S\u00f8ren Kierkegaard - protoexistentialist\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/the-fideistic-leap\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Fideistic Leap\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Planet Macneil Blog\",\"description\":\"The blog of Dr Michael P\u00f2l Macneil PhD\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/78d80b09bb7f5dca3e2779fb6a2c2d33\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":[\"Person\",\"Organization\"],\"@id\":\"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/78d80b09bb7f5dca3e2779fb6a2c2d33\",\"name\":\"Michael Macneil\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8c23bafa3d0e8438466d9d51dd2b843fab8754f428006edc6c50c8d9b66d9fa1?s=96&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8c23bafa3d0e8438466d9d51dd2b843fab8754f428006edc6c50c8d9b66d9fa1?s=96&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8c23bafa3d0e8438466d9d51dd2b843fab8754f428006edc6c50c8d9b66d9fa1?s=96&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Michael Macneil\"},\"logo\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8c23bafa3d0e8438466d9d51dd2b843fab8754f428006edc6c50c8d9b66d9fa1?s=96&r=g\"},\"description\":\"I write software and am studying part-time for a PhD in philosophy. I have an MSc in Electronic Engineering and an MA in Studies in Philosophy and Religion. I am a Microsoft Certified Professional with an MCSD. I have a teaching qualification in Physics and like most things science. Otherwise I like classic VWs, watching Rodney Howard-Browne, playing guitar and making computer music.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/author\/mmacneill123\/\"}]}<\/script>\r\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Fideistic Leap - Planet M Blog","description":"The Fideistic Leap - One of the most interesting challenges to reasonable and rational Christianity was to reject the possibility that Christianity could or more strongly, should be defended rationally.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/the-fideistic-leap\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Fideistic Leap - Planet M Blog","og_description":"The Fideistic Leap - One of the most interesting challenges to reasonable and rational Christianity was to reject the possibility that Christianity could or more strongly, should be defended rationally.","og_url":"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/the-fideistic-leap\/","og_site_name":"Planet M Blog","article_published_time":"2023-06-29T10:39:25+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-03-25T22:17:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":519,"height":456,"url":"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kierkegaard.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Michael Macneil","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Michael Macneil","Estimated reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/the-fideistic-leap\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/the-fideistic-leap\/"},"author":{"name":"Michael Macneil","@id":"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/78d80b09bb7f5dca3e2779fb6a2c2d33"},"headline":"The Fideistic Leap","datePublished":"2023-06-29T10:39:25+00:00","dateModified":"2024-03-25T22:17:18+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/the-fideistic-leap\/"},"wordCount":1107,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/78d80b09bb7f5dca3e2779fb6a2c2d33"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/the-fideistic-leap\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kierkegaard.jpeg","articleSection":["PhD Appendices","Random Thoughts","Theses"],"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/the-fideistic-leap\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/the-fideistic-leap\/","url":"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/the-fideistic-leap\/","name":"The Fideistic Leap - Planet M Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/the-fideistic-leap\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/the-fideistic-leap\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kierkegaard.jpeg","datePublished":"2023-06-29T10:39:25+00:00","dateModified":"2024-03-25T22:17:18+00:00","description":"The Fideistic Leap - One of the most interesting challenges to reasonable and rational Christianity was to reject the possibility that Christianity could or more strongly, should be defended rationally.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/the-fideistic-leap\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/the-fideistic-leap\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/the-fideistic-leap\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kierkegaard.jpeg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kierkegaard.jpeg","width":519,"height":456,"caption":"S\u00f8ren Kierkegaard - protoexistentialist"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/the-fideistic-leap\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Fideistic Leap"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/","name":"Planet Macneil Blog","description":"The blog of Dr Michael P\u00f2l Macneil PhD","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/78d80b09bb7f5dca3e2779fb6a2c2d33"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":["Person","Organization"],"@id":"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/78d80b09bb7f5dca3e2779fb6a2c2d33","name":"Michael Macneil","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8c23bafa3d0e8438466d9d51dd2b843fab8754f428006edc6c50c8d9b66d9fa1?s=96&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8c23bafa3d0e8438466d9d51dd2b843fab8754f428006edc6c50c8d9b66d9fa1?s=96&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8c23bafa3d0e8438466d9d51dd2b843fab8754f428006edc6c50c8d9b66d9fa1?s=96&r=g","caption":"Michael Macneil"},"logo":{"@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8c23bafa3d0e8438466d9d51dd2b843fab8754f428006edc6c50c8d9b66d9fa1?s=96&r=g"},"description":"I write software and am studying part-time for a PhD in philosophy. I have an MSc in Electronic Engineering and an MA in Studies in Philosophy and Religion. I am a Microsoft Certified Professional with an MCSD. I have a teaching qualification in Physics and like most things science. Otherwise I like classic VWs, watching Rodney Howard-Browne, playing guitar and making computer music.","sameAs":["https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog"],"url":"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/author\/mmacneill123\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/699","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=699"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/699\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/700"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=699"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=699"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=699"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}