\n
\n
Revision History<\/h1>\n
The first update “Six Months of Vaccine<\/em>” is found here<\/a>.<\/p>\n I have also added a second update<\/a> in August 2021 as it becomes apparent the vaccines are not delivering what they were promised to deliver in countries with the highest vaccination levels and there is less rational justification than ever before for mass or mandatory vaccination.\u00a0 I also refer you to this article<\/a>, which was focussed specifically on the AFLDS seminar which includes audio\/video links and is a comprehensive update on most aspects of the pandemic, including the vaccination programme.<\/p>\n The update of October 2021 was to add a link<\/a> to the story told by an ex-pharmacy manager who resigned over damage they had witnessed through the quality of the shots being offered.<\/p>\n An extensive update during the early stages of the omicron outbreak was moved to this article:\u00a0 https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/the-sad-farce-of-omicron\/<\/a><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Note:<\/strong>\u00a0 Owing to continuing popularity of this article, I decide to update it in Sept 2022 after it was parked for a time!<\/em><\/p>\n This update<\/a> includes a retrospect and a summary of the hard data<\/strong> on vaccine related deaths and injuries.<\/p>\n Here in the UK the vaccine has been hailed by our Primeminister as “our [only] means of escape”.\u00a0\u00a0<\/em>So, the major push is on at the moment to sell<\/em> the vaccine to the population that has previously been “burned” with previous vaccination scandals<\/a> where vaccines caused death and disability; this is also the case worldwide wherever<\/em> vaccines have been used.\u00a0 Now, I will let a group of doctors outline just what this ‘vaccine’ is – as they rightly explain, it is questionable whether it should be called a “vaccine” as it does not yet meet the minimum scientific criteria to be called one, it is still legally and formally ‘an experimental biological agent’<\/em> – their conclusions can be summarised in a few sentences:<\/p>\n Prohibited<\/em><\/strong> for the young (0-20).\u00a0 There is no significant risk factor from the disease in this age group; risk from problems arising from the use of an unproven biological agent are far higher.<\/p>\n Discouraged<\/em> <\/strong>for the healthy<\/em> middle-aged (20-69) – your immune system is perfectly capable of dealing with it and you can manage it as you would any other disease if possible transmission to vulnerable relatives is an issue – receive treatment if necessary and quarantine until you are well.\u00a0 There is no confirmed evidence that the vaccine will actually prevent transmission (one of the major problems with calling it a ‘vaccine’ which does<\/em> prevent transmission) so its use as a preventative agent for the socially concerned is spurious.<\/p>\n Optional<\/em> <\/strong>for the co-morbid (2.6+) and elderly (>70).\u00a0 This would be a personal risk-benefit assessment in consultation with a medical professional.<\/p>\n There is no evidence that vaccines should be racially prioritized<\/em>, i.e. certain ethnic groups are more at risk from COVID (consider the Africa and India experience where the death-rate is a fraction of the rate in the West despite predictions of ‘meltdown’ in those places because of a lack of health infrastructure and overcrowding).<\/p>\n If you have no time to read the full whitepaper<\/a>, or to listen to a presentation<\/a>, both of which are exceptional<\/strong><\/em>\u00a0 resources summarising important issues surrounding the mismanagement and misinformation regarding COVID-19 more generally, here are a some juicy bits to suck on:<\/p>\n Strong vaccine advocates Dr. Offit and Dr. Hotez, who would be expected to be enthusiastic about these experimental vaccines, have not really endorsed these new experimental vaccines, because previous coronavirus vaccines have a long history of failure<\/strong><\/em> due to \u201cantibody dependent enhancement.\u201d\u00a0 Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE), is when anti-COVID antibodies, created by a vaccine, instead of protecting the person, cause a more severe or lethal disease when the person is later exposed to SARS-CoV-2 in the wild.<\/a>The vaccine amplifies the infection rather than preventing damage<\/em><\/strong>. It may only be seen after months or years of use in populations around the world. This paradoxical reaction has been seen in other vaccines and animal trials. One well-documented example is with the Dengue fever vaccine, which resulted in avoidable deaths…Despite over 50 years of active research, a Dengue vaccine still has not gained widespread approval [because of] ADE.<\/p>\n ‘Science’, ‘Nature’, ‘Journal of Infectious Diseases’ and others, have already<\/strong><\/em> documented ADE, or vaccine-associated hypersensitivity (VAH) risks in relation to the development of experimental COVID-19 vaccines.<\/p>\n Placental inflammation resulting in stillbirths mid-pregnancy<\/strong><\/em> (second trimester) is seen with COVID-19 and with other similar coronaviruses. The way the experimental vaccines work [a non-replicating vector or strand of RNA], it is concerning that that deleterious effect on the placenta, which in the wild only lasts as long as the acute illness [because your immune system destroys it], would<\/strong><\/em> instead be lifelong<\/strong><\/em> [because your immune system does not remove it because it is a non-<\/em>replicating vector].<\/p>\n In 1986, Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA). It provides immunity from liability<\/strong><\/em>\u00a0 to all vaccine manufacturing companies…AstraZeneca this time round goes even further in acknowledging that this is an emergency situation and requested [and got]<\/strong> no liability from the EU<\/strong><\/em>. \u201cThis is a unique situation where we as a company simply cannot take the risk if in…four years<\/a><\/strong><\/em> the vaccine is showing side effects,\u201d Ruud Dobber, a member of Astra\u2019s senior executive team, told Reuters.<\/p>\n Two executives of AstraZeneca resigned in protest<\/em><\/strong> that the ADE and Placental Inflammation risks were not sufficiently considered for the vaccine to be even provisionally safe to market and petitioned the EU to deny certification at this point.<\/p>\n Both Dr Fauci and the Surgeon General of the US have publicly stated that this “vaccine” does\u00a0not\u00a0<\/em><\/strong>prevent transmission – that means masks, social distancing and any other measure deemed “for your safety”<\/em> remain in force.\u00a0 The idea that our life “will return to normal”<\/em> if we take the vaccine, which is what is being pushed worldwide to get people to take an unproven, experimental biological agent with clear risk factors, is therefore duplicitous and false.<\/p>\n People who have taken the vaccine have now tested positive for COVID-19:\u00a0 it is unknown<\/em><\/strong> whether they will always test positive but it provides an excellent way to inflate COVID-19 infection figures to provide further justification for restrictions on your freedom and liberty.<\/p>\n The only group for which the vaccine seems a rational choice is for the elderly, co-morbid.\u00a0 Most deaths from COVID-19 have occurred in nursing homes amongst the frail elderly.\u00a0 As such, they are the group to be prioritised.\u00a0 It makes no sense to prioritise medical staff, police, military or civil workers who are in demographics with extremely low fatality rates.\u00a0 It is even less rational to take the vaccine if it merely renders the carrier asymptomatic if they do get exposed – they would then be a more effective spreader to vulnerable groups if asymptomatic transmission is considered a real risk.\u00a0 This was always a dubious claim which seems completely discredited if the ‘vaccine’ is being rolled out as it is now – they have refuted their own position.\u00a0 For healthy people<\/em> to take an unproven, experimental biological agent<\/em> which may cause them to get more ill if they are exposed to the virus, is an issue of national security<\/em>.\u00a0 Consider the scenario where you have a severe pandemic because of a reaction to the vaccine leaving a shortage of medical staff, police, military and government functions.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Consider carefully the implications of those paragraphs in your choices – you may have an OK response to the vaccine but the vaccine causes a severe<\/strong><\/em> reaction to the real disease.\u00a0 If you were severely ill with the disease and could not return to normal life, you could not claim for damages and worse still, if you died, your family would get no compensation other than what charity the government might push your way.\u00a0 The vaccine does not prevent transmission, it merely renders you asymptomatic and makes you COVID-19 positive.\u00a0 Unless<\/em> you are in a high risk group, which are really the frail elderly or those of middle age with multiple serious co-morbidities (diabetes, kidney problems, respiratory conditions…this<\/em> is where you need an honest doctor), there is no compelling case to take a vaccine.\u00a0 It is not my word, it is the considered opinion of extremely well qualified, informed, senior doctors<\/em>.<\/p>\n Now, this image shows the\u00a0official<\/strong><\/em>\u00a0 US CDC statistics for Infection Fatality Rates (so bear in mind these figures would be as inflated as much as they possibly could be to justify the COVID narrative):<\/p>\n Consider the rational implications of these survival rates<\/strong><\/em> – is it really worth decimating our way of life and causing preventable deaths (which are now occurring because of the cancellation of ‘routine’ primary care in surgeries and hospitals) through a range of far more severe conditions?\u00a0 Around 60 million will die this year of a range of conditions and 6 million, i.e. around 10%, of those will be because of other<\/em><\/strong> respiratory diseases.\u00a0 By the logic of this pandemic, our response should be 10\u00d7 more severe for those deaths that have already happened than in response to COVID-19.<\/p>\n However, it gets worse than that!<\/strong><\/em>\u00a0 As I mentioned at the beginning of the article, the vaccine has been hailed by our Primeminister as “our [only] means of escape”.\u00a0 <\/em>Now, if that really\u00a0is<\/em> the case, we would never<\/em> escape from COVID restrictions on our liberty.\u00a0 Already the vaccine master plan, seen as the exit door from lockdown, is threatening to unravel as “new virulent”<\/em> strains are appearing (this is the major reason given for re-entering full lockdown countrywide rather than try and maintain some semblance of liberty by using a tiered system for different areas of the country).\u00a0 When the developers of the UK Vaccine (also present in the US and elsewhere, Oxford-AstraZeneca) were challenged about the efficacy of the virus against the “new strains” <\/em>they blustered a little bit and said “maybe the vaccine will need tweaking”<\/em>.\u00a0 Of course, this is a major public relations disaster in the making as it has been pushed as the\u00a0only<\/em> way to renormalize life and the current strategy is to ignore<\/em> any possible problems with it and bury any news that could cause a lack of confidence in it.\u00a0 Labour unions are already demanding “at home”<\/em> rights in the name of “staying safe”,\u00a0 <\/em>the totally unaffordable furlough scheme has resurfaced and education of children is suspended for the same irrational<\/em> reasons (children are unaffected by this virus and there has only been one possible<\/em> case worldwide of transmission from a child to a teacher). It is worthwhile adding this postscript after six months of rollout of the vaccine and also to comment on what is now happening, particularly with regards to problems that are emerging with the vaccines.<\/p>\n First, it is interesting to note what is not<\/em> happening.<\/p>\n Secondly, what is<\/em> happening is equally disturbing.<\/p>\n The obvious question here, is who is this guy <\/em>?\u00a0 Well, this is no anti-vax hero but one of the principal architects and experts used by various vaccination programmes in the last decade, including by the Bill & Melinda Gates foundation (themselves accused of all kinds of misdemeanours in their programmes).\u00a0 That is, he was a director<\/strong> of these vaccination programmes.<\/p>\n His scenario is novel, in the sense I have never heard of it in previous research, but is new (May 2021), expert commentary.\u00a0 He has recently written an open letter to the WHO.\u00a0 His concern can briefly be stated that worldwide vaccination programmes of this type is forcing the virus to mutate in an aggressive direction, i.e., to become more virulent and dangerous, rather than to mutate into less virulent forms as herd immunity establishes itself.<\/p>\n In somewhat unintuitive reasoning, vaccination may propagate the more virulent strains faster by creating \u201casymptomatic carriers\u201d who then spread it to vulnerable populations.\u00a0 The \u201cevolutionary strain\u201d caused by mass vaccination, promotes the generation of more serious, vaccine resistant strains that breach the \u201cimmune threshold\u201d of previously healthy or asymptomatic carriers.\u00a0 This is an extra danger with this type of \u201cspike protein\u201d targeting virus (a point also made in the AFLDS briefing) that relies on tuning the immune system to a particular variant of the virus.<\/p>\n Dr Bossche favours \u201cinfection prevention measures\u201d, i.e., lockdown, quarantine, isolation but<\/strong> only of the symptomatic, as the solution to maintaining a herd immunity which would build up and cause the virus to weaken.\u00a0 If the general population, particularly the younger age-groups, are not exposed to the relatively harmless virus, their natural immunity does not develop, and the immune system of the population generally is weakened. \u00a0As I understand it, he is not arguing for no <\/em>vaccination but targeted <\/em>vaccination to protect vulnerable<\/em> groups but to allow a herd immunity to build up. He also explicitly rules out mass vaccination of the elderly just because they are elderly \u2013 the mortality rate was still only 5% in that demographic.<\/p>\n >><\/p>\n It might be helpful to think of this as analogous to why we take a \u201cjab\u201d only if we are travelling to regions where we might be exposed to unfamiliar pathogens.\u00a0 It is effective because the virus has no evolutionary pressure to mutate by overuse of the vaccine.\u00a0 The controversy surrounding \u201csuperbugs\u201d caused by the overuse of antibiotics is also conceptually, as well as biologically, similar as he makes clear in his commentary and FAQs.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n <<<\/p>\n This reliance on \u201cinfection prevention measures\u201d was also championed by Dr Vernon Coleman who makes a systematic study demonstrating it was the measured social isolation measures of infected individuals that brought previous epidemics to an end, not the vaccines.<\/p>\n The rigorous, complex and elaborate argumentation is on his personal website, https:\/\/www.geertvandenbossche.org\/<\/a> .\u00a0 Owing to his stature, this has survived uncensored at this point.<\/p>\n What is most significant though is his prediction that a large reduction in human population could occur through such a mass vaccination strategy as a lethal pathogen is generated:<\/p>\n \u201cFrom all of the above, it\u2019s becoming increasingly difficult to imagine how the consequences of the extensive and erroneous human intervention in this pandemic are not going to wipe out large parts of our human population. One could only think of very few other strategies to achieve the same level of efficiency in turning a relatively harmless virus into a bioweapon of mass destruction.\u201d (p4, Open Letter)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n \u201cPopulation reduction\u201d has been a preoccupation, some would say obsession, of wealthy billionaires and their think-tanks such as the Rockefeller foundation \u2013 Ted Turner infamously said the ideal level was about 500 million total population worldwide.\u00a0 We might just be in the next execution phase of the plan, you can read more about this perspective in my thesis here<\/a>.<\/p>\n As I have previously written<\/a>, if you get paid 75% of your wage via the government for staying home and doing no work, you will need some astonishing<\/em> incentive to return to work in your “COVID-secure”<\/em> environment to get that extra 25%.\u00a0 Our governments, because they are not prepared to reconsider that their strategy was based on faulty science and the financial interests of large pharmaceuticals, are placing their populations at great risk with an unproven, experimental biological agent that could create a far worse pandemic in the coming years.\u00a0 If<\/em>, as is now being pushed, these “new”<\/em> variants are said to require “further restrictive measures”<\/em>, i.e. more<\/em> restrictive than full lockdown, we are really looking at the preparation for the ‘Great [Economic] Reset<\/a>‘ where capitalism is replaced with what is promised<\/em> to be a more benevolent form of synarchic socialism as envisaged by the World Economic Forum where a few big multinational companies provide approved and equal resources for us all, we give up our rights to private property, enjoy a Universal Basic Income and inequality is swept away – at the cost of individual choice in the name of the “common good”<\/em> but look at what you get in return, you are “safe” <\/em>with a lifelong requirement to take various vaccines.\u00a0 Should the wheels come off the vaccine train, State socialism is the only<\/em> option left, which for the conspiracy theorists among us, is what was planned all along. One of the countries that was most aggressive in vaccination was Israel.\u00a0 They are now reporting that 95% of the hospitalisations are amongst the fully vaccinated.\u00a0 This is a mainstream news item:<\/p>\n Channel 13 Israel<\/a><\/p>\n An excerpt from the full report is here:<\/p>\n World Health Organization European Advisory Group of Experts in Immunization former Vice President Professor\u00a0Christian Perronne<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0yesterday said that all vaccinated people must quarantine over the winter months or risk serious illness.<\/p>\n Perronne specializes in tropical pathologies and emerging infectious diseases. He was Chairman of the Specialized Committee on Communicable Diseases of the High Council of Public Health.<\/p>\n Confirming the rapidly deteriorating situation in Israel and the UK, the infectious disease expert stated: \u201cVaccinated people should be put in quarantine, and should be isolated from the society.\u201d<\/p>\n He went on to say: \u201cUnvaccinated people are not dangerous; vaccinated people are dangerous for others. It\u2019s proven in Israel now \u2013 I\u2019m in contact with many physicians in Israel \u2013 they\u2019re having big problems, severe cases in the hospitals are among vaccinated people, and in UK also, you have the larger vaccination program and also there are problems.\u201d<\/p>\n The current working group on the COVID-19 pandemic in France was reported to be \u201cutterly panicked\u201d on receipt of the news, fearing pandemonium if it follows the guidance of the experts.<\/p>\n Israeli doctor Kobi Haviv told\u00a0Channel 13 News<\/em>: \u201c95% of seriously ill patients are vaccinated. Fully vaccinated people account for 85-90% of hospitalizations. We are opening more and more COVID branches. The effectiveness of vaccines is declining or disappearing.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Of particular note in this paragraph is the assertion “Unvaccinated people are not dangerous; vaccinated people are dangerous for others”<\/em>.\u00a0 This is also admitted in a rather obtuse way in an article<\/a> from the liberal Left’s Huffington Post (known for its objective and un-biased reporting…):<\/p>\n The researchers found that those who do become infected with the Delta variant after their second jab have similar peak levels of virus<\/em> to unvaccinated people.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n \u201cThe fact that they can have high levels of virus suggests that people who aren\u2019t yet vaccinated may not be as protected from the Delta variant as we hoped,\u201d said Sarah Walker, professor of medical statistics and epidemiology at the University of Oxford. \u201cThis means it is essential<\/em> for as many people as possible to get vaccinated \u2013 both in the UK and worldwide.\u201d\u00a0 (emphasis added)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n Untangling the vexed words of the eminent Professor here, what she is saying is that the infected vaccinated are just as contagious<\/em> as the unvaccinated.\u00a0 That is probably a shock to you – imagine if that had been on the mainstream news 10 months ago!\u00a0 If you were being vaccinated so as not to risk passing on the disease to one of your “vulnerable” relatives, you have believed a myth.\u00a0 What is the dear Professor’s solution to a failing vaccination programme?\u00a0 Obvious – more<\/em> people should get vaccinated, presumably to prevent “serious illness”<\/em> if you, the unvaccinated<\/em>, do contract it from a vaccinated<\/em> person.\u00a0 Trouble is, as the interview excerpted above, 90-95% of hospitalisations for “serious illness”<\/em> are now among the double-vaccinated. For the very real concerns some frontline workers have witnessed as to the quality and content of the shots being administered, see this article<\/a>.<\/p>\n In summary, the dance being danced by those who want to mandate vaccination, is getting increasingly complex and counter-intuitive.\u00a0 In reality, the most effective protection against COVID is exposure to it in the wild and you developing a natural, broad-spectrum immunity to it, as was suggested by dissident epidemiologists and some of the medical experts I quoted earlier in the article.\u00a0 When I initially wrote the article, some of this was speculative or predictive based on the best science, now we have studies and the hard evidence to confirm the shortcomings and the active risk of mass vaccination.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n With a quick scan over this article\u2019s content and the associated articles, there is nothing which requires withdrawal even if, occasionally, it was not quite on the mark (thankfully).\u00a0 The main thrust is very sound, and I believe vindicated as events have unfolded, and I leave it basically unedited as it is valuable as history.\u00a0 As it is still, remarkably, a popular article, I have decided to add this update as data and evidence of real harm is now forcing its way into the mainstream academic literature. All this should be good news but the use of COVID as cover for government tyranny and the withdrawal of civil rights is far from over, the massive oppression of people in China over their \u201czero COVID\u201d policy is seldom reported but has intensified, not waned.\u00a0 We have a friend in Shanghai who told us of their doors being welded shut to prevent them leaving the block of flats to shop.\u00a0 People survived by pooling what they had and by scaling out of windows to raid food-stores where food had been piled up outside because they were not allowed to open.\u00a0 We were also told that being locked in the tower blocks, they then had to avoid the drones which the police were flying to monitor the blocks.\u00a0 If anyone was found \u201cbehaving in an inappropriate manner<\/em>\u201d on their veranda, e.g., shouting for food, their bank account was automatically debited by the government.<\/p>\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n
![\"COVID](\"https:\/\/planetmacneil.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/survivalrates.jpg\")
<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\nSix Months of \u2018Vaccine\u2019<\/h1>\n
\n
\n
The Warning of Dr Geert Vanden Bossche PhD<\/h1>\n
A Political Footnote<\/h1>\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\nPostscript (August 2021): The Effectiveness of the Vaccine is “Fading” (Israeli Doctor)<\/h1>\n
\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n
\n
\nSeptember 2022 \u2013 Retrospect and What\u00a0 The Hard Data is Now Telling Us<\/h1>\n
\n<\/a>
\nMany people believe the COVID pandemic is \u201cover\u201d and that is correct from the point of view of the medical threat.\u00a0 When people talk about variants now, it is sub-variants of variants and it is increasingly questionable as to whether you are, in fact, still dealing with something that is fundamentally the same. \u00a0With the CEOs of the vaccine manufacturers bemoaning the \u201cignorance\u201d of the world causing them to now having to dispose of their COVID-shots because no-one wants them, a critical part of the mass vaccination programme has collapsed.\u00a0 It is clear that the vaccine does not prevent infection, does not prevent transmission and people who have had all the shots and all the boosters are getting reinfected, sometimes very publicly as they announce it to the world.\u00a0 Rather quietly, governments are not buying the shots because they no longer \u201cwork\u201d, thus the interesting and sometimes down and dirty developments which we will discuss below.<\/p>\n